Comparison of sequential three-drug regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection.

نویسندگان

  • Gregory K Robbins
  • Victor De Gruttola
  • Robert W Shafer
  • Laura M Smeaton
  • Sally W Snyder
  • Carla Pettinelli
  • Michael P Dubé
  • Margaret A Fischl
  • Richard B Pollard
  • Robert Delapenha
  • Linda Gedeon
  • Charles van der Horst
  • Robert L Murphy
  • Mark I Becker
  • Richard T D'Aquila
  • Stefano Vella
  • Thomas C Merigan
  • Martin S Hirsch
چکیده

BACKGROUND The optimal sequencing of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is unknown. We compared several different antiretroviral treatment strategies. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, partially double-blind trial used a factorial design to compare pairs of sequential three-drug regimens, starting with a regimen including zidovudine and lamivudine or a regimen including didanosine and stavudine in combination with either nelfinavir or efavirenz. The primary end point was the length of time to the failure of the second three-drug regimen. RESULTS A total of 620 subjects who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy were followed for a median of 2.3 years. Starting with a three-drug regimen containing efavirenz combined with zidovudine and lamivudine (but not efavirenz combined with didanosine and stavudine) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with a regimen containing nelfinavir (hazard ratio for failure of the second regimen, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.06), as well as to delay the second virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.09), and significantly delayed the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.39) and the first virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.34). Starting with zidovudine and lamivudine combined with efavirenz (but not zidovudine and lamivudine combined with nelfinavir) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with didanosine and stavudine (hazard ratio, 0.68), and significantly delayed both the first and the second virologic failures (hazard ratio for the first virologic failure, 0.39; hazard ratio for the second virologic failure, 0.47), as well as the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.35). The initial use of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz resulted in a shorter time to viral suppression. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of antiretroviral drugs depends on how they are combined. The combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz is superior to the other antiretroviral regimens used as initial therapy in this study.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of four-drug regimens and pairs of sequential three-drug regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND It is unclear whether therapy for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) should be initiated with a four-drug or two sequential three-drug regimens. METHODS In this multicenter trial we compared initial therapy involving four-drug regimens containing efavirenz and nelfinavir in combination with either didanosine and stavudine or zidovudine and lamivudine with therapy involving...

متن کامل

Comparison of Sequential Three-drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for Hiv-1 Infection. N Engl Similar Challenges with Retention in Care Issues

Michael P. Dubé, Robert A. Parker, Kathleen Mulligan, Pablo Tebas, Gregory K. Robbins, Ronenn Roubenoff, and Steven K. Grinspoon Division of Infectious Diseases, Indiana University, Indianapolis; Statistical and Data Analysis Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Nutrition, Harvard University, and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts Uni...

متن کامل

Enfuvirtide antiviral activity despite rebound viremia and resistance mutations: fitness tampering or a case of persistent braking on entering?

Combination antiretroviral therapy has revolutionized the care of HIV-1–infected individuals, producing profound improvements in morbidity and mortality. Therapy does not, however, cure HIV infection , and the goal of combination therapy remains the suppression of HIV-1 replication below the limit of detection. Despite a growing array of antiretroviral therapy options, virologic suppression is ...

متن کامل

Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND The use of either efavirenz or lopinavir-ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is recommended for initial therapy for patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, but which of the two regimens has greater efficacy is not known. The alternative regimen of lopinavir-ritonavir plus efavirenz may prevent toxic effects associated wi...

متن کامل

Simplification strategies to reduce antiretroviral drug exposure: progress and prospects.

Current U.S. guidelines for initial therapy of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) infection recommend daily, lifelong treatment with a combination of three antiretroviral drugs consisting of two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor. Although this approach has been successful in reducing morbidity and mortality from HIV...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The New England journal of medicine

دوره 349 24  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003